Tag Archives: Discipleship

How To Read The Bible in Context by Dave Smith

How To Read The Bible in Context by Dave Smith

My wife Angie and I have conversations all the time. But it’s not surprising that 5 minutes into the conversation, one of us will say these words, “What are you talking about?” We seem to be using the same words but they have completely different meanings. For you see, I am primarily a “thinker” and she listens as a “feeler.” Our internal dictionaries are wired differently.

I submit to you that the same thing is true in the Church today. She finds herself in a modern day Biblical fog. We may employ the same words as Jesus or Paul, but their meanings over time have been slowly severed from their biblical moorings. The original biblical meanings have become lost in our contemporary lexical definitions. These shifted words/meanings now dictate what we will hear from the Biblical text. Equally they prevent us from experiencing the world as Jesus did. Or even coming close to dialoguing with the real Apostle Paul. He looks and sounds much more like us than a first century Jew. 

 

Words Matter: Recovering the Biblical Meaning

Philip K. Dick (in his 1978 essay “How to Build a Universe That Doesn’t Fall Apart Two Days Later”) made the following statement on the meanings of words: “The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words.” Now, we are not accusing the Church of intentional mind control through the revision of words. But her passion to get their gospel word out and to convince/convert more and more people has created the unintentional consequences of removing words from their ancient context and making them mean something entirely different from the biblical writers. 

Words such as “gospel” and “salvation” and “Church” no longer have the robust meaning breathed into them by the Spirit. In our attempt to make the gospel more approachable and culturally relevant, we have at that same time domesticated its meaning. It has become a term more focused on us than on Jesus. A “Gospel message” in today’s language means, “A proclamation where hearers were made aware of their sin and that Jesus is the only means to find forgiveness?” True but truncated. A Biblical definition of Gospel is that Jesus is King of the Universe. His Kingdom now rules. The Gospel finds its primary definition in Him. 

The same effect can be found in the modern concept of salvation. These days salvation is often seen as a synonym for Gospel. A Gospel message results in an offer of salvation and those that believe will go to heaven when they die. True in modern parlance but marginal at best by biblical standards. God’s rule and His offer of salvific grace is not primarily focused on heaven as our home as much as it is the restoration of humans to reflect the glory of the Imago Dei, culminating in a flourishing life in the here and now. “Are you saved and going to heaven” should not be the question of our day. Rather, “are you a small working model of New Creation and do you reflect the Image of Jesus in such a profound manner that people are hungry for the life you now live?” Yes. Words Matter and their robust definitions bring hope to most people.

 

Context Matters: Learning to Read the Bible in Its Original Setting

The reformation of the Church will not come about by merely handing someone a better theological dictionary. Certainly, it will help to some degree since biblical word meanings come from a deep reading of the sacred texts. Nevertheless, a more foundational issue is that we in the church have accepted the practice of reading the Bible “out of context.” 

By “contexts” I first mean we neglect or plead ignorance to the historical and cultural contexts of the Bible. Second, we pull passages out of the larger literary context from which it has been placed by the inspired author and treat them like self-sustaining entities. Finally, we return to our modernization of ancient word meanings. Simply put, words mean what the ancient authors wanted them to mean. There was no such thing as a dictionary in antiquity. Words were defined by the culture in which they arose or by the literary context in which they found their narrative or poetic home. Yes. Words Matter. Even more, Context Matters. 

Handing someone a dictionary is informative. Passing out Bibles to people can be life-changing for them. But will it fuel a reformation? What might be missing? Our contemporary devotional reading practice needs redeeming. Most Christians today unknowingly read their modern world into the ancient text of the Bible. In layman’s terms, we read and immediately apply, without traveling through the often-neglected step of “interpretation.” This is the essential work of a historian in search of age-old truth as we ask the fundamental question, “What did this text mean to its original recipients?” Without this intermediate step of interpretation, we are assuming that the Bible was written directly to us in our modern-day world, not to people and churches of biblical antiquity. 

We practice what many have experienced during a typical Bible Study. Five people sitting around a table. The Bible is read aloud and then one after another people share, “What did that passage mean to you?” And “to you?” And “what about you?” Then, from all the shared opinions, we seem to choose what appears to be the best answer from the mix of voices. 

May I share the danger in this approach to Bible reading. First, we are affirming that there is no stable meaning to a biblical text. It changes each time a person reads the passage, resulting in a whole range of meanings. The peril of this is that Jesus will be calling us to abandon all for the sake of Him and His gospel. 

But may I humbly ask, which gospel? Which of the 4-5 meanings will you put your trust in?  Words Matter. Contexts Matter More. 

Second, as we approve this reading scenario, we are also saying, “just read and then guess what Jesus meant.” May I urgently state, “I do not care what you think the Bible says!” The inspired person in your conversation with the Bible comes from the writer of the Biblical book. Matthew is inspired. So is Mark, John, Luke, Paul, and Peter. Reading in context means we need to ask and answer only one question, “What was the writer’s original meaning?” We must follow a simple and linear approach to the Bible; read, interpret, and then apply. When we abandon this Bible reading plan, we become ripe candidates for a muddled gospel. Dennis Kinlaw quoted the Archbishop of Canterbury, William Temple saying, “If your concept of God is wrong (which comes from inadequate Bible reading), the more religious you become the more dangerous you are to yourself and to others.” (Let’s Start with Jesus) Developing sound and solid Bible reading skills may be the most vital starting point to the reformation of the Church. 

We do not want to trample upon a believer’s devotional reading of Scripture. Heaven forbid. People should encounter Jesus through His word on a regular basis, out of love and obedience. This should be regular and daily if possible. Millions of Christians around the world practice the “Daily Office” where the word and prayer is engaged up to three times a day (morning, noon, evening). Additionally, evangelicals across the globe read through the Bible regularly to hear from heaven and obey. But I might call this a “First Reading” of Scripture. It’s your first encounter with the text. As a disciple, as a student of the Word, we should push forward and engage in a “Second reading” of the text. We go over it again and again, examining its literary context, the cultural background from which it arose, and the meaning of its ancient words. The overarching question which should undergird this Second Reading is “What was the author’s original meaning as revealed from the literary, cultural and linguistic (word meaning) contexts? A “Second Reading” or a disciple-making approach must investigate its meaning as it was originally intended to be heard, interpreted and applied. We honor the text when we read it in context. Words Matter. Context Matters More. Even more so in the Bible.

 

The Word Incarnate in Us Matters Most: Becoming Disciples

The fog has now taken on global proportions as Bible sales are at record levels. Hunger for God’s truth is found everywhere. But biblical illiteracy has surpassed them both. We want to hear God’s voice, but the Church is not offering the necessary interpretive tools. The biblical story that illustrates this best is the encounter of Philip and the Ethiopian Eunuch (Acts 8:26-40). 

Philip approaches the Eunuch as he is sitting in his chariot reading the book of Isaiah out loud. Philip asks the right question, “Do you understand what you are reading.” He does not ask him, “What it means to him.” He asks the Eunuch about Isaiah’s meaning. Profoundly, the Eunuch responds, “How can I unless someone explains it to me?” There are two questions housed in those words. First, I need someone to help me interpret this difficult passage. But second, and even more revealing, the word for “explain” is not asking for a mere explanation. It is the word for “guide.” The Eunuch is not asking for a commentary answer to Isaiah’s rich yet difficult meaning. He is asking for a guide or what we may call a mentor to help grasp what Isaiah the prophet means as his truth is lived out by a Christ-follower. 

The Eunuch does not need a dictionary or commentary. He needs a role-model. The same word is used in reference to the role of the Spirit, “But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears (John 16:13).” I need a Spiritual guide to help me in the process of living out the Word. This is the cry of countless people in the Church today. 

This is precisely what is lacking in the church today. We are handing out Bibles by the case. We have access to limitless commentaries. What the Church must recover is our call to be Spirit-guides. First, we must teach clergy and laity alike how to interpret the word. But second, how to apply the word as its truth takes up transformational residence in a human being. What does it mean to be a Christian who lives by the guidance of the Spirit, where “He will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears.” Words Matter. Context Matters More. The Word Incarnate in us Matters Most.  

One final shortcoming of our contemporary approach to the word is found in the phrase, My personal daily devotions. Our privatized time with the Lord has many benefits. But we must confess that it is indeed a modern invention. In the ancient world, encountering scripture was a public event with interpersonal accountability. Genesis 2:18 should be applied across the Church with Bible reading, “It is not good for man to be alone.” 

John Wesley fostered this personal accountability and required members of his new movement to participate in what were called Class and Band meetings in the mid-1700’s. With this in mind, let’s reflect upon a pertinent event in Church History. In the 1730-40’s, the US Colonies experienced the First Great Awakening. It was primarily initiated and led by George Whitefield. Yet when he died, the “revival” quickly ended. However, during the same time in England, the Wesleyan-Methodist movement continued long after the death of John Wesley? Adam Clark, an early historian of Methodism, reflected upon this, 

“It was by this means (the formation of small groups) that we have been enabled to establish permanent and holy churches over the world. Mr. Wesley saw the necessity of this from the beginning. Mr. Whitefield, when he separated from Mr. Wesley, did not follow it. What was the consequence? The fruit of Mr. Whitefield died with himself. Mr. Wesley’s fruit remains, grows, increases, and multiplies exceedingly.”

In fact, in correspondence with an old friend later in life, George Whitefield himself confessed, “My brother Wesley acted wisely—the souls that were awakened under his ministry he joined in class [meetings] and thus preserved the fruits of his labor. This I neglected, and my people are a rope of sand.” 

John Wesley’s own words confirm this practice. From his journal entry in August 25, 1763 he wrote, 

I was more convinced than ever, that the preaching like an Apostle, without joining together [in class meetings] those that are awakened, and training them up in the ways of God, is only begetting children for the murderer. How much preaching has there been for these twenty years all over Pembrokeshire! But no regular societies, no discipline, no order or connection; and the consequence is, that nine in ten of the once-awakened are now faster asleep than ever.

Words matter, but they need a lived out, incarnate context to bear fruit for generations to come. In the end, what might be the best way to define and describe the work of Spirit-enabled guides (aka disciples) and the overall focus of the Church in these days of Re-Formation:

The primary mission of every church is to create a culture of Christo-formity (aka; read, interpret, apply His Word and become just like Him) so that every believer will embody and reflect the indwelling Presence of Christ (Imago Dei) to a dark yet hungry World.

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

Salvation Is More Than A One Time Event by Maxie Dunnam

Salvation Is More Than A One Time Event by Maxie Dunnam

As Christians we do not emerge full-grown. Salvation is not a one -time event. To see it in its fullness, we talk about “going on to salvation.” If any doctrines within the whole compass of Christianity may be properly termed fundamental, they are doubtless these two—the doctrine of justification, and that of the new birth. The former relates to that great work which God does for us, in forgiving our sins; the latter, to the great work which God does in us, in renewing our fallen nature. Salvation includes these two works.

This is the reason the new birth is such a powerful image. As our physical birth is the momentous beginning of our physical life on earth, our new life in Christ is the beginning of a life of our souls for spiritual growth. We are by God’s grace redeemed from sin, justified in relation to him. We are also born of the Spirit. 

We need to keep reminding ourselves of the fullness of salvation. The new birth is that great change which God works in the soul following justification, raising it from the death of sin to the life of righteousness. “It is the change wrought in the whole soul by the almighty Spirit of God when it is ‘created anew in Christ Jesus’; when it is ‘renewed after the image of God, in righteousness and true holiness’; when the love of the world is changed into the love of God; pride into humility; passion into meekness; hatred, envy, malice, into a sincere, tender, disinterested love for all mankind.” (John Wesley)

Even here, in the description of these elements of salvation—justification and new birth—there is the dynamic of growth, going on to salvation. We may be justified by grace through faith and be converted to Christ in the miracle of a moment, but the making of a saint is the task of a lifetime. As Jesus talked about being “born again,” Paul in his Epistle to the Ephesians calls us to no longer be infants, but to “grow up in Christ.”

No matter where we are in our Christian life, we need to take time now to reflect on our spiritual journey. You can begin by responding to this question: Can you recall a time, or a time frame, when you definitely claimed the Christian faith and named yourself a Christian?

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

Clean by Julie Miller

Clean by Julie Miller

Jesus’ Example of Servanthood and Humility

Jesus knew his time had come. He had loved the disciples throughout his ministry. Now, before he went to the cross, he wanted to help them comprehend the full extent of his love. John says, “Now, He loved them to the very end.” (John 13:1b NLT) 

“So he got up from the table, took off his robe, wrapped a towel around his waist, and poured water into a basin. Then he began to wash the disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel he had around him. (John 13:4-5) In his undergarments, dressed as a slave, taking the posture of a slave, doing the task of a slave, Jesus began washing the disciples’ feet. He got down on the dirty floor and took their rough, cracked, and filthy feet in his hands. One by one, they let him.

But Peter protested. How could he let the Son of God hold his dirty, stinky feet? How could he let the Messiah act as his servant?

Jesus replied, “Unless I wash you, you won’t belong to me.” Simon Peter exclaimed, “Then wash my hands and head as well, Lord, not just my feet!” (John 13:6-9) If that is what it takes, Lord, I’m all in! 

Jesus replied, “A person who has bathed all over does not need to wash, except for the feet, to be entirely clean. And you disciples are clean.” (John 13:10). You’re clean and you’re dirty. You’re clean…and still you must let me wash your feet.

 

Clean and Dirty: A Lesson in God’s Grace

This act of washing feet is the ultimate example of servanthood. It is a lesson in humility. It is a depiction of God’s grace. It is an exhortation for the days ahead and a picture of Christ’s sacrifice for us. It is also the embodiment of how He makes us clean, how he completely washes away our sins and mistakes. Because we’re clean, and we’re dirty.

Just like the disciples, those of us who have decided to follow Christ are clean. At the moment of salvation, we are made clean. The moment we turn from our former life and decide to accept Christ as our Savior and follow Him, He forgives all our sins and mistakes, and makes us clean. So we are clean. But, because we are human, we are imperfect, fallible. We will make more mistakes…we get dirty.

 

Modern Examples of Spiritual Cleansing

Foot washing was a necessity, basic hygiene in the ancient world. Today, the closest thing we have to foot washing is a pedicure at our local spa. Fun but hardly a necessity. What if, instead, we imagined Jesus cleaning something else dirty? Something more normal for us today? 

What would it be like for Jesus to clean your home? The really messy parts? The junk drawer? The dirty laundry? The scum around your tub? The toilets? 

What if he cleaned up your finances? Going through every expense, loan, and payment. Cleaning it up. Seeing every stupid purchase, self-indulgence, every mistake. Maybe your computer. What if Jesus sat down to clean up your files and browser history? Maybe your relationships. Every interaction, nasty word, biting comment, and misstep. What would it be like to watch Jesus kneeling down and cleaning it all?

What is that dirty place you just can’t imagine Him cleaning for you?

 

Jesus Sees It All and Makes Us Clean

Just like the disciples’ dirty feet were right there to be seen, God sees it all, all the ick and the scum, all the lying and the cheating, all the gossip and slander, the selfishness and pride, every single sin and mistake, and still He says, “I can make you clean.” He sees it all, and He still says, “I love you. I will love you to the end, and I can make you clean.”

But we have to sit in the chair. We have to present our filth and let Him wash our feet. In repentance, we simply tell the Lord, “This is what I’ve done. I don’t want to do it anymore. Help me get clean. Here are my dirty feet.” And he does, as many times as we need, because we’re clean and we’re dirty. He loves us and he makes us clean.

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

Hunger For Discipleship by Brian Yeich

Hunger For Discipleship by Brian Yeich

Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.” Matthew 5:6

 

In the Inspire Movement, the ministry that my wife and I share as Missioners, we teach four core values of discipleship that can be found as we look at the life of Jesus in the Gospels: 

  • Seeking growth in our love for God and neighbor
  • Using spiritual disciplines as a means of grace
  • Sharing fellowship with spiritual friends
  • Engaging mission in everyday life. 

These values help frame a way of life that is aligned with the life that Jesus calls us to. The first of these values, seeking growth, is almost a prerequisite to the rest. If we are not hungering for more of God in our lives, or at least hungering to have a hunger, then our disciplines, fellowship and mission will just be going through the motions. However, if we are hungry for more of God, our disciplines will bear greater fruit, our fellowship, whether in bands and house fellowships, will draw us closer to Jesus and our mission will be empowered by the Holy Spirit. 

 

The Power of Spiritual Hunger: Why Desire for God Fuels True Discipleship

I recently returned from Benin in West Africa and I had a wonderful experience with a great team and a receptive group of Christian leaders, hungry for more of God. The people in Benin have a rich history and culture and the group of Christian leaders we worked with shared stories of how their church in the past had been evangelistic and discipleship focused. However, in recent years they had experienced decline and their diagnosis of the cause of the decline included a move away from Wesleyan bands and classes. As I presented some training on the Inspire way of life and how groups like fellowship bands and house fellowships can provide a catalyst for following Jesus more closely, they were enthusiastic! They engaged in bands during our time together and came away with an expressed desire to start as soon as possible. I am waiting to hear stories of fruit that may have sprung up as a result of our time together. 

 

Reviving the Church Through Wesleyan Discipleship and Fellowship Bands

A common theme in churches that we work with is a focus on discipleship as knowledge. While that is certainly an important aspect of discipleship, what seems to be missing at times is a space where people can come together to talk about their life with Jesus without other curriculum guiding the conversation. We need each other if we are going to follow Jesus faithfully. A hunger for knowledge is good, but if a hunger for more of the love of God and neighbor doesn’t accompany it, then we are missing the transformation of our hearts. 

 

John Wesley’s Heart-Warming Experience: A Reminder That Faith Is More Than Knowledge

In many ways, this was the experience of John Wesley prior to his Aldersgate experience. It was on May 24, 1738 that John Wesley reluctantly went to a Christian meeting on Aldersgate Street in London. This was the meeting place of a group called the Moravians, who had been influential on Wesley. Just a few months earlier, John had returned from a mission trip to America, which had not gone well. In fact, he came back from that trip doubting his own faith and struggling with fear. People from this Moravian group had been trying to help him work through his crisis of faith, and so maybe Wesley thought that attending one of their meetings might be helpful. As he sat at this Christian meeting, he listened as the speaker read from an introduction to a Bible commentary on the book of Romans by Martin Luther, the German pastor credited with kicking off the Protestant Reformation in the 1500s. As the speaker read the words from the introduction, John was reminded that Christ had died for him and through faith in Christ he was forgiven of his sins. This faith was a gift and Luther’s words echoed in John’s mind, “Ask God to work faith in you; otherwise you will remain eternally without faith, no matter what you try to do or fabricate.” But at that moment, it was more than just something he believed in his head. John records this event in his personal journal: “I felt my heart strangely warmed. I felt I did trust in Christ, Christ alone for salvation: And an assurance was given me, that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.”

Scholars like to debate what happened to John Wesley at Aldersgate. However, I think we could say that Wesley was already a Christian – he was raised in church, he was a pastor, he went to seminary, he went on a mission trip to America and he practiced strict spiritual disciplines. Yet he realized something was missing and that hunger led him forward. Hungering for more of God may start with a simple recognition that there is more to life and faith than what we are currently experiencing. What are you hungering for?

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

From The Archives: The Logic Of Holiness by Andrew Thompson

From The Archives: The Logic Of Holiness by Andrew Thompson

Over the years at Wesleyan Accent, we have been blessed by numerous authors and articles. In this new space, we are dusting off pieces of wisdom from the Archives we believe still offer a good word to the church. Today, we are revisiting a piece on the intersection of holiness and evangelism. This article originally appeared here in January of 2014. May it bless you as it has already blessed many.

 

There is a phrase in Wesleyan theology that holds the key to understanding most everything about present salvation. The phrase is “holiness of heart and life.” This is one of those terms that seems simple at first glance and yet is packed with meaning on multiple levels.

It’s also a term worth exploring, and I want to explore it here. But first a little detour about theological language in general.

 

The Language We Use

Conventional wisdom from “experts” dictates that we should find ordinary or commonplace words to describe Christian concepts so we can avoid putting up barriers between the Church and would-be believers. Our evangelism can be hindered, so this thinking goes, by the vocabulary we use to talk about the Christian faith.

I’ve heard some version of this perspective many times over the course of my ministry. And I’ve always had questions about it. To what length should we take this advice? Are we talking about avoiding the technical vocabulary of theology, or should we avoid core biblical terms as well? I’ve heard people suggest that we shouldn’t use the language of sin and salvation, either because it is off-putting or because it conjures up lowbrow images that good, sophisticated Christians should want to avoid. Is that a good idea?

At times, I wonder whether this point-of-view is just a concession to mainstream consumer culture. Many churches have emptied their membership requirements of anything that actually looks like, well, a requirement. The idea is to attract more people to the churches in question by becoming “seeker sensitive”—but does the evidence show that such a strategy really results in congregations filled with mature disciples of Jesus Christ?

Maybe emptying our language of its robustly Christian inflections is just another version of the almost irresistible urge to mimic the larger culture in the hopes of getting that culture’s blessing for what we Christians are doing. I think that’s likely the case. I also think it is a reason to consider an alternative strategy: Namely, embracing with gusto the vocabulary of both the Bible and the historic Wesleyan tradition. Such a strategy would seem particularly important if certain words or phrases themselves have great explanatory power for how we understand the nature of God, human beings, salvation, and discipleship.

 

The Meaning of Holiness

In the New Testament, the Apostle Paul explains the nature of sanctification as a life of holiness. He describes it to the church at Thessalonica in this way: “It is God’s will that you should be sanctified … For God did not call us to be impure, but to live a holy life. Therefore, he who rejects this instruction does not reject man but God, who gives you his Holy Spirit” (1 Thessalonians 4:3, 7-8; NIV).

John Wesley was captivated by the biblical notion of holiness. He equated the life of holiness with present salvation. In one sense, holiness is that state of being purified from wickedness—in thought, word, and deed. But for Wesley, to understand the root meaning of holiness for us, we have to understand what God’s holiness really means first.

We can see the character of divine holiness, according to Wesley, in the First Letter of John. (This is the book of the Bible that Wesley once called “the deepest part of the Holy Scripture.”) It is 1 John that connects how we are to love one another with how God loves us. 1 John 4:7-8 reads, “Beloved, let us love one another, because love is from God; everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, for God is love” (NRSV).

In his Explanatory Notes Upon the New Testament, Wesley keys on this passage in 1 John as capturing the real substance of biblical holiness. His comment on verse 8 reads in part, “God is often characterized as holy, righteous, wise; but not holiness, righteousness, or wisdom in the abstract, as he is said to be love; intimating that this is his darling, his reigning attribute, the attribute that shed an amiable glory on all his other perfections.”

Thus, to become holy is to have your heart so transformed by God’s love that love itself becomes the defining mark of your very person. Wesley paints an image of what he means by this transformation in the 1741 sermon, “The Almost Christian.” He writes, “Such a love of God is this as engrosses the whole heart, as takes up all the affections, as fills the entire capacity of the soul, and employs the utmost extent of all its faculties.”

So holiness is not a static concept. It isn’t a condition where a Christian desperately tries to avoid thinking the wrong thing or doing the wrong thing, lest his spotless purity be marred by sin. Instead, it is the dynamic reality of love—transforming the believer’s life and giving the believer a new set of values and commitments that are in harmony with God’s desires for his children.

On Wesley’s account, this is the heart of the Christian life. Those who are growing in holiness are experiencing what we mean by salvation in this present life.

 

Holiness … From Heart to Life

The Wesleyan conception of holiness requires one more element in order to adequately explain how it takes root in the lives of Christian believers. This element is wrapped up in the phrase, “of heart and life” that we attach to the core term “holiness.”

When reading John Wesley’s writing on salvation, you’ll encounter some version of the phrase “holiness of heart and life” over and over again. A related phrase is “inward and outward holiness” by which Wesley means essentially the same thing.

The “heart and life” and the “inward and outward” act as qualifiers on the core term “holiness.” One way to grasp why they are important is to recognize that we never see them in the reverse order: it is never holiness of life and heart, for instance, but always holiness of heart and life.

In the church today, we often shy away from anything that emphasizes the need to experience something inwardly that we do not have any control over. We like the language of discipleship, because discipleship strikes us as something you go out “there” and “do.” What does it mean to be a Christian, we ask? And the answer is always something about getting outside the four walls of the church, making a difference, transforming the world, etc.

There is a Wesleyan critique to make to this approach to discipleship that is found in the view that holiness always moves from heart to life. Wesley himself was always highly skeptical of Christians who thought that their good works were the substance of their faith. He thought that such a view relied on what he called the “outward form of religion” while denying religion’s true power.

To put the matter another way: Wesley does not believe that you can work your way into faith, hope, and love. He rather believes that these core Christian virtues are “wrought in us (be it swiftly or slowly) by the Spirit of God,” as he puts it in a 1745 letter. And thus it is crucial that we have our hearts transformed inwardly in order for anything we do outwardly to be pleasing in God’s sight.

Commenting on Jesus’ teaching that “blessed are the pure in heart,” Wesley says that God is always well pleased with “a pure and holy heart” but “he is also well pleased with all that outward service which arises from the heart” (“Upon our Lord’s Sermon on the Mount, IV”). The logic of this movement from heart to life Wesley states in this way: the “latter naturally [results] from the former; for a good tree will bring forth good fruit” (“Heaviness through Manifold Temptations”). This is all simply a way of saying that salvation is something God does—not us.

If we want to live in this present life as God desires us to live, then we need an outpouring of his grace into our lives. We will never be able to fake true holiness through the mechanical actions of daily life—even when those actions have a religious character to them. And who we truly are inwardly will finally be shown by our outward attitudes, words, and deeds in the world. So if you want your life to be marked by holiness in an honest and authentic way, it must be lived out of a holy heart that has been made holy by the action of the Holy Spirit.

All of this means that we can’t discard a phrase like holiness of heart and life only to replace it with something more pedestrian: “learning to be more loving,” or “becoming a better person,” or some such collection of words that seems less intimidating. The phrase itself communicates a powerful message. It is about holiness—biblical holiness—that we should be concerned. That holiness only comes about in us in a particular kind of way, and it is a way that calls for us to throw ourselves on the mercy of God.

Those recent trends to give up the traditional language of both the Bible and the Christian tradition in order to make the faith more palatable to outsiders are deeply misguided. When we go that route, we inevitably present Christianity as something less than it really is. So perhaps what we need to do is not change our language but rather repent and recognize that becoming a Christian involves a conversion—in every aspect of heart and life.

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

Admirers vs. Followers by Rob Haynes

Admirers vs. Followers by Rob Haynes

I enjoy watching sports. I am amazed at the skills and talents demonstrated on the field in a competitive game or match. From my couch, I admire them while I enjoy a snack in the comfort of my living room. I must admit that rarely, however, do I follow their example of their hard work and dedication to their craft. I do not follow their advice on how to master the skills they demonstrate. It is much easier to be an admirer than a follower. In the Christian life, it is important to make a distinction between “admirers” and “followers.”  An admirer is awe-struck. A follower is devoted. An admirer applauds. A follower surrenders. An admirer approves. A follower obeys.

The gospels tell us that a large crowd gathered for Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. Matthew records that the crowds were “astounded” at his teaching, for he taught as someone with authority (see 7:28-29). The crowd admired Jesus. However, there were a few that went beyond mere admiration, they became followers. They are the ones who said that they were willing to give up what the world is offering to accept what Jesus is offering. They would rather do that than to give up Jesus’ invitation for the emptiness of the world’s offerings.

The Bible shows us that Jesus is constantly inviting and challenging people to move from a mere admirer to be a follower of Jesus. Such a move involves more than just a mere verbal agreement. It requires some sort of action or commitment. Frequently, there is a price to pay. The same holds true today. We see this in John 3 when Nicodemus, a Jewish religious leader comes to talk with Jesus. In their conversation, Jesus tells Nicodemus that he must be born again: he must put away his old life and be personally and publicly connected to him. Later, we see that Nicodemus does so when he asks for Jesus’ crucified body, and he helps bury him. Nicodemus became a follower.

The man we commonly refer to as the “Rich Young Ruler” in Luke 18 is a different story. This man admired Jesus and his teachings. He asks Jesus, essentially, “What’s the least I need to do to get into heaven?” Their conversation shows us that the young man liked the idea of Jesus’ teachings. However, when Jesus asked him to be a follower, to make a commitment, he went away sad. He could not move past being an admirer.

While the Bible gives us pictures of admirers and followers, in many parts of the church today, we have added another category: Users. Users of Jesus want the promise of eternal life, a cultural status, or to get some help out of a tight spot. Putting too heavy an emphasis on encouraging people to know where they are going when they die, without teaching them how to live, has created users like the Rich Young Ruler. They want to know: what’s the least I need to do?

While there are many reasons for the trend in exhaustion and burnout among ministry leaders, I think part of the problem is that many churches are full of admirers and users. In many places, ministry models have been developed to try to re-excite admirers and users, but have not asked them to move to actually being followers. Admirers and users are willing to identify as Christians, while reserving the label “disciple”, what I am calling a follower, for the “Super-Christians.” There are many reasons why so much of the church finds itself in this state today. One key area that I want to point out is the over-emphasis on program-driven activities rather than disciple-making ministry. Organizing groups by affinity, age, or need only to make it easier to present information without the expectation of transformation can lead to a church full of mere admirers. Offering an endless stream of information-based lectures and videos, carefully crafted by a few to impress the many, and do not actually expect personal transformation, can lead to large groups of consumers, not disciples.

Danish Philosopher Søren Kierkegaard put it well in Practice of Christianity:

“If you have any knowledge at all of human nature, you know that those who only admire the truth will, when danger appears, become traitors. The admirer is infatuated with the false security of greatness; but if there is any inconvenience or trouble, he pulls back… Christ, however, never asked for admirers, worshipers, or adherents. He consistently spoke of ‘followers’ and ‘disciples.’”

The focus of evangelism is not to merely make another admirer or a user. The goal should be to make disciples. Reclaiming our Wesleyan tools to make disciples who will make disciples through the Classes, Bands, and Societies is a great step in making followers of Jesus Christ. You can read more about those here.

The kind of relationship Jesus asks for is one that changes our words, our actions, our thoughts about others, our habits, and our views about the world. This type of relationship should change our values and our pursuits. It should change us to the very core. Such a relationship cannot be cultivated by mere admirers. It requires devoted followers.

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

Distinctive Style of Methodists: Our Worldwide Parish by Maxie Dunnam

Distinctive Style of Methodists: Our Worldwide Parish by Maxie Dunnam

Followers of Jesus have a distinctive style. There are many marks of the Methodist Style. We have considered A Catholic Spirit and Heartfelt Religion. Let’s look now at one other distinctive mark, our worldwide parish.

It is gathered up in Wesley’s popular saying, “The world is my parish.” That word captures the style of the Methodist movement—a concern for all humankind, a spending of ourselves and our resources that all the world might be brought to Christ.

Most of what I share here and much I have shared about other marks are from my book, Going on to Salvation (Nashville, Discipleship Resources, 1996). The truths still speak to us today.

We need to know that Wesley came to this position “kicking and screaming.” His decision to join Whitefield in preaching in the fields to the poor and to coal miners was a difficult one. He fought against it. Whitefield was having great success in reaching for Christ those for whom the established church paid no attention. He sent for John Wesley, knowing his preaching power and organizing skill.

Up to this point, Wesley had only preached in regular church services while in England. Should he accept Whitefield’s appeal and help with the open-air meetings in Bristol? Charles insisted that he not do it. But John practiced what he preached. He called on the Christian fellowship for guidance. He submitted the decision to the Fetter Lane Society, and they decided he should go. Wesley’s Journal for Saturday, March 31 reads:

In the evening, I reached Bristol and met Mr. Whitefield there. I could scarce reconcile myself at first to this strange way of preaching in the fields, of which he set me an example on Sunday; having been all my life (until very lately) so tenacious of every point relating to decency and order, that I should have thought the saving of souls almost a sin if it had not been done in a church.

Wesley spoke to a little society on Sunday evening using the Sermon on the Mount “one pretty remarkable precedent of field-preaching,” he observed, “though I suppose there were churches at that time also.” The next day, Monday, Wesley reported in his Journal:

At four in the afternoon, I submitted to be more vile, and proclaimed in the highways the glad tidings of salvation, speaking from a little eminence in ground adjoining the city, to about three thousand people. The scripture on which I spoke was this,…”The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He hath anointed Me to preach the gospel to the poor.”

In his book, The Radical Wesley, Howder Snyder sums up what happened:

Characteristically, Wesley immediately began to organize. He formed a number of societies and bands and on May 9 acquired a piece of property where he built his “New Room” as a central meeting place. When Whitefield returned to America in August, Wesley was left totally in charge of the growing work. He divided his time between Bristol and London, concentrating on open-air preaching, organizing bands and speaking at night to an increasing number of societies.

The Wesleyan Revival had begun. From the beginning it was a movement largely for and among the poor, those whom “gentlemen” and “ladies” looked on simply as part of the machinery of the new industrial system.The Wesleys preached, the crowds responded and Methodism as a mass movement was born. (pp. 32-33)

That’s what Methodism is all about—a missional and evangelical witness and outreach that sees the world as our parish—and every person in the world, rich and poor, educated and uneducated, without regard to race—every person as a person for whom Christ died.

The movement will go on and be empowered as we Methodists recover the warm heart, when we provide structures of love and care, and when we get a passion for ministry and mission, believing that “the world is our parish.”

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

A Mark Of God’s Presence by Marjana Luist

A Mark Of God’s Presence by Marjana Luist

A few years ago, on a beautiful summer day, our family gathered by the rally track to cheer on my nephews in their race. We spent the entire day on a treeless hill, fully exposed to the sun. By evening, the effects were undeniable—our uncovered skin had turned red.

Just like the sun leaves a mark on us, so does God’s presence—though not on our skin, but within us. Being in His presence changes us, and that change is reflected in our attitudes, actions, words, and very being.

A deep tan requires more than a few fleeting moments in the sun. Likewise, true transformation into God’s likeness is not instant—it takes time. For real change to take place within us, a quick reading of a few Bible verses or a prayer listing all the things we want God to do for us is not enough. To bear the mark of God’s presence, we must spend time in His presence. A lasting tan requires regular exposure to the sun, and in the same way, the mark of God’s presence in us requires ongoing communion with Him.

Two years ago, while vacationing in a warm country, I spent several days soaking up the sun and swimming in the pool for hours, yet when I returned home, I looked just as pale as when I had left. The reason? A highly effective sunscreen.

Just as sunscreen lessens the sun’s impact on our skin, certain attitudes and spiritual barriers can diminish the Holy Spirit’s transformative work in our hearts. A person may attend church year after year, read the Bible, and pray, yet no real transformation takes place in their behavior, attitudes, or character. The reason is a protective layer that prevents the Holy Spirit from working in their heart. In spiritual life, such “strong sunscreens” can be apathy, certain fears, a false sense of satisfaction with one’s spiritual state, or anything else that blocks the Holy Spirit from reaching the heart.

One could attend three worship services and five Bible studies in a week, seemingly basking in God’s “sunshine,” but if there is a protective layer around the heart, no mark of God’s presence will be left. Faith will remain superficial and will not transform into a heartfelt belief. Not every religious experience changes us, but rather, the experience of the Holy Spirit working within us and in our lives.

Faith moves from being an intellectual belief to a deeply personal conviction when we encounter the Holy Spirit’s work in our lives. This was also the case with John Wesley, who after the Holy Spirit’s light broke through, spoke of his heart being “strangely warmed.”  

When we remove the barriers around our hearts and truly seek God’s presence, we allow His Spirit to transform us. This is not a one-time event but a continual process—like stepping into the sunlight daily, allowing its warmth to leave a lasting mark. It is this “sunlight” of God in which we are transformed into His likeness and where our divine image is restored. The mark of God’s presence and the work of the Holy Spirit in us bring forth Christlike qualities such as love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control.

As Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 3:18, when we approach God with unveiled faces (without protective layers), we are transformed into His image (Christ-likeness) with ever-increasing glory. This is the work of the Holy Spirit—the true mark of God’s presence in us.

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

Distinctive Style of Methodists: Heartfelt Religion by Maxie Dunnam

Distinctive Style of Methodists: Heartfelt Religion by Maxie Dunnam

Followers of Jesus have throughout history exhibited a distinctive style.  In my first article I shared about Wesley’s peculiar flair. The second article highlighted a Methodist’s catholic spirit. Here, we will look to the heart of the Wesleyan movement.

 

 

The Methodist movement was born in England and soon began to burn with a fire of love across the land, in large part, because of two big problems in the Established Church. One was spiritual apathy. Deism had flavored the intellectual and religious climate. God had become a benevolent ruler of the universe, removed from personal experience. In the arrogant rationalism that pervaded the day, everything had to be utterly reasonable.

The second thing that had happened was that the nature of the church as an organization had become remote, removed from life, not touching the people where they were. One cleric, for instance, had been made a bishop and given a lifetime stipend, but never set foot in the diocese over which he presumably had spiritual and temporal oversight. It was obviously all temporal and nothing spiritual.

Into that setting with those two characteristics – spiritual apathy and a remote church structure -came the Methodist revival with an answer to these two glaring, devastating failures of the church. The answer? Heartfelt religion.

For spiritual apathy, there was the experience of the warm heart. People wanted desperately not only to hear the gospel, but also to experience it. So John Wesley’s Aldersgate experience became the model: “I felt my heart strangely warmed, I felt I did trust Christ, Christ alone for salvation; and an assurance was given me that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.” That experience was repeated over and over.

Furthermore, for people who experienced a church that had become lifelessly formal at best, and coldly remote at worst, the Methodists came with ministries of care and warm concern. The class meetings and bands of the Methodist societies became the settings for these expressions of compassion. People cared for and looked after each other’s souls. Loving hearts set other hearts on fire.

In a lecture at Emory University, Dr. Theodore Runyon introduced what to me was a whole new way of thinking about the “heart strangely warmed” and structures of care as means for our growth in Christ and our life in the world. It is a new way of thinking about a Methodist style. He used three terms to make an important distinction: orthodoxy, orthopraxis, and orthopathy. The first two terms were familiar; not the third. Orthodoxy is right doctrine, right opinion, right belief. But Methodists have never believed that orthodoxy was enough. God demands right action, right practice, right behavior – that is orthopraxis.

Even with that kind of plea for orthopraxis, working faith, Wesley always insisted that as faith without works is dead, works without faith profiteth nothing; that “all morality, all justice, mercy and truth – without faith – is of no value in the sight of God.”

Neither orthodoxy nor orthopraxis alone is sufficient. And what Runyon adds is that even together, they are not enough. There must be orthopathy. This means right passions, senses, tempers, dispositions; and in the larger sense, right experience. This, says Runyon, is the challenge to a theology of conversion – 

To recognize the crying need of humankind to be encountered and transformed by Christian faith in all aspects of their being, including the emotions, feelings, and experiences. Nothing less is a sign of the kingdom and its power in the midst of the present age. And nothing less than this kind of theology and experience ought to undergird our preaching, our Christian education, our evangelism and mission, and our witness and action for peace and justice.

Runyon then gave three hallmarks for such an orthopathic theology. First, Wesley’s “bookends” of creation and kingdom, the fundamental conviction that all creation is to be redeemed by Christ. The world and everything in it is to be brought under the Lordship of Christ not destroyed, but redeemed.

The second hallmark of orthopathy is realism about the present order of things. “We are a part of a world that has corrupted God’s good creation and become insensitive and deaf to God’s will and way.” The gospel forces us to see the alienation and estrangement of the present order and present the gospel necessity of being reborn into a new order.

Thus, the final hallmark of orthopathic theology is the familiar word of John 3:7: “You must be born from above.”

Runyon’s insight helps us think clearly about how we provide the opportunities for the “heart strangely warmed” and the structures of care that will be settings for the transformation of our whole life and total experience. When Wesley insisted that “true Christianity cannot exist without the inward experience and the outward practice of justice, mercy, and truth,” he brought orthodoxy, orthopraxis, and orthopathy together and gave us our marching orders.

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free

Accountability In The Wesleyan Way by Jorge Acevedo

Accountability In The Wesleyan Way by Jorge Acevedo

My youngest son spent a decade as a chef in training in many fine dining restaurants in the Southwest Florida area. Several of the eating establishments were seafood restaurants as you would expect living on the Gulf Coast. Nathan learned to cook some of the most fantastic fresh seafood dishes, but here was his dirty little secret. He did not eat seafood. He did not eat his cooking!

“Accountability” is one of those words in our culture, and sadly in the Church, that goes over as well as the word “evangelism.” People shut down when they hear it, but I think it’s because, like the word “evangelism,” we have not had good models and experiences of it. Typically, we think of accountability as a heavy handed, manipulative experience of being gaslit into doing stuff we’d rather not do. Such usage is often dished out but never practiced by those serving it. Let me suggest that there is a better way to describe and yes, even experience accountability.

Here’s a definition I would offer that I believe is in the Wesleyan spirit of “watching over one another in love.” Accountability understood from our holiness tradition is inviting trusted Christ followers to help me honor my most sacred commitments. If my walk with God, marriage, parenting, and vocation are some of my most sacred commitments then having a few trusted companions to help me stay faithful to those commitments is essential.

A lesser-known accountability group in early Methodism was a group of men and women hand-selected by John Wesley known as the “select society.” This group existed to serve as models of Christian perfection and as a training environment on both the doctrines and methods of the growing Methodist movement. Dr. Michael Henderson writes of the select societies, “The select society was an elite corps of those enthusiasts who had worked their way up through the ranks of class meeting, society, and band and were considered by both their peers and the leaders to be the standard bearers of the movement.”1 Yet unlike the scouting program of our day, there were no “badges” for being in the select society. It was simply an intentional gathering of women and men who embodied the best of the Methodist movement and desired to continue to grow in grace.

In A Plain Account of the People Called Methodists, Wesley describes the Select Society this way:

I saw it might be useful to give some advice as to those who continued in the light of God’s covenant, which the rest of their brethren did not want, and probably could not receive. So, I desire a small number of such as appeared to be in the state, to spend an hour with me every Monday morning. My design was, not only to direct them how to press after perfection; to exercise their every grace, and improve every talent they had received; and to incite them to love one another more, and to watch more carefully over each other; but also to have a select company, to whom I might unbosom myself on all occasions, without reserve; and whom I could propose to all their brethren in as a pattern of love, of holiness, and of good works.2

These were leaders who had been invited to live in rich, deep, formational community with one another. Personal holiness of heart and life, growing in ministerial capacity and living in gracious and accountable community were the aims.

It is also important to note that this became a place for Mr. Wesley to “unbosom” himself. This word, not used much in the 21st century, means “to disclose or reveal.” I find it fascinating that Mr. Wesley was self-aware enough to create a people and place for himself to live in grace and truth with fellow believers. Henderson reports, “Wesley encouraged a freewheeling and open discussion, especially on matters significant to the direction and policies of Methodism. He welcomed criticism of the system and of his own place in it.”3 Wesley understood the wisdom of a “do as I do” kind of spirituality. He “ate what he cooked.”

This is the stream of Christianity we find ourselves in as Methodists. This is how we understand accountability. Embedded in our DNA is a kind of accountability that fosters flourishing in our formation to Jesus as well as fruitfulness in our mission for Jesus. For more than 35 years, I have had a “band of brothers” with whom I can unbosom myself and it has been the game changer in my life and ministry. I’m eating Mr. Wesley’s cooking too.

So, how about you? Do a spiritual inventory right now. Do you have a band of brothers or circle of sisters with whom you can “unbosom” yourself? Who helps you discern how you are engaging in ministry to the world? Step into the way of accountability. It’s good for the soul.

 

1 Henderson, John Wesley’s Class Meeting: A Model for Making Disciples, 121.

2 Henderson, John Wesley’s Class Meeting: A Model for Making Disciples, 122.

3 Henderson, John Wesley’s Class Meeting: A Model for Making Disciples, 123.

Share the Post:

Subscribe

Get articles about mission, evangelism, leadership, discipleship and prayer delivered directly to your inbox – for free